Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41812137›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Using Semiautomated WhatsApp Messages for Daily Stress Measurements: Integrated Usability and Feasibility Study.

Janika Thielecke, Maartje Bakhuys Roozeboom, Irene Niks, Elsbeth de Korte, Sadegh Shahmohammadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Janika ThieleckeWork and Heath, The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Sylviusweg 71, Leiden, 7415 NC, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1310-3485
Maartje Bakhuys RoozeboomWork and Heath, The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Sylviusweg 71, Leiden, 7415 NC, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7796-7808
Irene NiksWork and Heath, The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Sylviusweg 71, Leiden, 7415 NC, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6502-0887
Elsbeth de KorteWork and Heath, The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Sylviusweg 71, Leiden, 7415 NC, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8491-623X
Sadegh ShahmohammadiWork and Heath, The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Sylviusweg 71, Leiden, 7415 NC, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5818-9913

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Stress is a key determinant of health outcomes and may influence work performance. Questionnaire-based assessments of stress are typically broad and retrospective. Daily stress measurements via smartphones offer more granular, real-time data but have adherence issues. Using an already established communication medium (WhatsApp) and a more conversational style assessment might improve adherence and help collect more detailed insights into (work) stress, underlying stressors, and countering energy sources. Objective: This study focuses on the usability and feasibility of semiautomated voice- and text-messages (with and without emojis) via WhatsApp as a method to collect daily data on experienced work stress, stressors, and energy sources. Methods: A sample of 210 workers was recruited via social media and participated in a 10-workday diary study using semiautomated WhatsApp messages to rate daily stress, stressors, and energy sources. Questions (with and without emojis) were presented by a chatbot as text messages with clickable buttons (multiple-choice questions; MC) or with instructions to answer with either a voice or a text message. The study used an experimental design with 4 groups: (1) week 1 voice, week 2 text/MC with emojis; (2) week 1 voice, week 2 text/MC without emojis; (3) week 1 text/MC, week 2 voice with emojis; (4) week 1 text/MC, week 2 voice without emojis. Pre- and poststudy web-based questionnaires assessed demographics, familiarity with voice messages, and usability, including participants' preference for research studies. Open answers were coded using artificial intelligence, and the number of stressors or energy sources was compared across the 3 collection methods (MC, voice, and text messages) to determine if the amount and quality of information collected differ per method within participants. Results: A total of 158 workers completed at least 80% of scheduled conversations. The sample was predominantly women(170/210, 81%), highly educated (173/210, 82%), and a slight majority worked part-time (109/210, 52%). Mean adherence to the daily schedule was very high (mean of 95%). The postquestionnaire revealed a strong preference for MC and text over voice messages, mostly due to ease and convenience in a variety of situations. The number of stressors per week was approximately 3 times higher in the MC-condition than in the voice condition, even though average stress levels per week did not differ significantly within participants. The number of energy sources was comparable between open answers in the voice and text conditions, but voice messages consisted of more words. Conclusions: Collecting (work) stress data via semiautomatic WhatsApp messages is a feasible method with low effort for participants. Usability ratings indicated a strong preference among participants for MC and text messages over voice messages. Future research should explore usability in more diverse samples and in direct comparison to traditional assessment methods.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsStress, PsychologicalText MessagingAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmartphoneSurveys and QuestionnairesAIartificial intelligencechatbotdiary studydigital stress assessmentfeasibilityjournallingmonitoringusabilitywhatsAppwork stress

Identifiers

PMID41812137
PMCPMC12978546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.