Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41812100›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2026

Mitigating Algorithmic Bias in Cancer Site Classification Models.

Abhishek Shivanna, Adam Spannaus, Jordan Tschida, John Gounley, Patrycja Krawczuk, Heidi Hanson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abhishek ShivannaAdvanced Computing for Health Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.ORCID 0009-0006-6522-8593
Adam SpannausAdvanced Computing for Health Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-2521-3657
Jordan TschidaAdvanced Computing for Health Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-1359-4165
John GounleyAdvanced Computing for Health Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.ORCID 0000-0001-8424-4982
Patrycja KrawczukAdvanced Computing for Health Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.ORCID 0000-0003-4860-9619
Heidi HansonAdvanced Computing for Health Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.

Funding

DOE DE-AC02-06-CH11357US Department of Energy (DOE) DE-AC05-00OR22725US Department of Energy (DOE) DE-AC5206NA25396US Department of Energy (DOE) DEAC52-07NA27344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntegrating artificial intelligence in cancer diagnostics has improved tumor classification beyond rule-based systems. Despite these advancements, these models may still encode demographic biases. We conducted a large-scale, applied bias-probing study of a deep learning-based cancer site classifier to quantify race information encoded in document embeddings. We then evaluated how performance changes when race-correlated embedding dimensions are removed in a post-training sensitivity analysis.

methodsThe cancer site classifier was trained using 3.5 million electronic cancer pathology reports from six of the National Cancer Institute's SEER registries. We trained a hierarchical self-attention network to generate 400-dimensional document embeddings. These embeddings were used to train two downstream, gradient-boosted decision tree classifiers: one to classify the cancer sites and another to predict racial categories. We identified overlapping features by intersecting the top 50 feature-importance rankings from the site and race models and computed their cumulative feature importance in each model. As a post hoc sensitivity analysis, we progressively pruned these overlapping dimensions, retrained the site model, and compared overall macro-F1 and accuracy, race-stratified macro-F1, and group fairness metrics on the basis of demographic parity and equalized odds before and after pruning.

resultsThe analysis revealed minimal feature overlap between the cancer site and race prediction models, and the cumulative importance scores indicated a negligible influence of racial information on clinical predictions. Post-training pruning of overlapping features did not compromise the models' diagnostic accuracy, with a 0.07% loss in accuracy.

conclusionOur findings demonstrate that HiSAN-generated embeddings from SEER data can be used effectively in cancer site classification without significant demographic bias influencing the outcomes. Post-training pruning therefore functions as a practical audit and sensitivity check.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNeoplasmsBiasClassification AlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansSEER Program

Identifiers

PMID41812100
PMCPMC13001901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.