ArticleOncology nursing forum2026
Clinician Perspectives on the Development of a Survivorship Care Plan Smartphone Application: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis.
Article in Oncology nursing forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Leveraging technology to address POST-Treatment Health Outcomes of Cancer Survivors (POSTHOC): A phase I/II randomized controlled trial of a survivorship care plan mobile application.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo describe clinicians' perspectives on POSTHOC (POSt-Treatment Healthcare Outcomes for Cancer survivors), a survivorship care plan (SCP) smartphone application (app). PARTICIPANTS &
setting14 clinicians, including 5 nurses, were recruited from oncology (n = 9) and other allied medical fields (n = 5). METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: Semistructured interviews about the clinician portal and patient-facing app were conducted to assess usability and utility.
findingsParticipants reported many positive perceptions regarding the SCP app, noting its accessibility, accountability tools, and ability to promote patient-provider communication at and in between appointments. Participants also noted several negative perceptions, such as the expectation for immediate clinician interaction. Clinicians commented on technical aspects and features of the SCP app to improve data usability (e.g., personalization, customization), minimize redundancy, and streamline feasibility and utility in the clinic. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Clinicians encouraged the continuation of the SCP app development with specific feedback for improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.