ArticlePloS one2026
Comprehensive methodology for sample enrichment in EEG biomarker studies for Alzheimer's risk classification.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDementia, particularly Alzheimer's disease (AD), constitutes a major global health concern, with AD accounting for approximately 70% of all cases. EEG-based biomarkers hold promise for early identification of individuals at risk; however, small and heterogeneous samples frequently limit generalizability.
methodsAn EEG-based sample enrichment framework was developed by integrating advanced signal processing, component-level feature extraction, data harmonization (neuroHarmonize), and Propensity Score Matching (PSM). EEG data from four independent cohorts were harmonized to reduce site-related variability while preserving covariates such as age and sex. Features including power, entropy, coherence, synchronization likelihood, and cross-frequency coupling were extracted from independent components. PSM was applied at 2:1, 5:1, and 10:1 ratios to expand and balance the control group (HC) relative to the Alzheimer's risk group (ACr), composed of PSEN1-E280A mutation carriers without cognitive symptoms.
resultsSample enrichment through PSM improved classification accuracy, with decision tree models yielding values between 0.91 and 0.96. Higher enrichment ratios enhanced model stability and generalizability, as shown by learning curves and confusion matrices. Feature selection was based on model performance and effect sizes (Cohen's d).
conclusionsThe proposed framework addresses sample size and variability constraints in EEG-based AD risk classification. SIGNIFICANCE: Harmonization and statistical balancing provide a replicable strategy for multicenter EEG studies targeting early AD detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.