Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41811917›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

Mechanisms for stimulating facility quality improvement: A positive deviance study of Tanzania's Star Rating Assessment.

Sanam Roder-DeWan, Anna Gage, Donat Shamba, Heller Rajab, Magreat Somba, Mohamed Mohamed, Mary Ramesh, Talhiya Yahya, Eliudi Eliakimu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sanam Roder-DeWanDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0114-2505
Anna GageInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Donat ShambaHealth Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Heller RajabHealth Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1524-8841
Magreat SombaHealth Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Mohamed MohamedDepartment of Quality Assurance, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Mary RameshHealth Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Talhiya YahyaDepartment of Quality Assurance, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Eliudi EliakimuDepartment of Quality Assurance, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2383-9530

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tanzania launched the nationwide Star Rating Assessment in 2015 and has implemented it as a cornerstone of its national quality improvement program. We use variation in assessment results to explore mechanisms through which facilities improve quality. A mixed-methods positive deviance approach was applied by ranking all primary care facilities included in the Star Rating Assessment (n = 5,595) by their change in score between 2015/16 and 2017/18. The least- and most-improved facilities (n = 27) were selected for qualitative interviews with the highest-ranking provider at the facility on the day of data collection. The dataset was thematically analyzed first as a full-set and then divided by most and least improved to develop a local theory of improvement. Interviews were conducted with 27 facility leaders in 27 primary care facilities. Analysis showed that the SRA helped providers and staff find meaning in their clinical work which served as a core mechanism for improvement. This meaning-making was supported by stronger relationships and connections between health system actors. Connection to leaders came through the creation of a shared national mission to improve quality and an accountability system that allowed respondents to advocate for change. Connections to colleagues came through greater collaboration within facilities and competition between facilities. Connection to patients came through improved knowledge about clinical and interpersonal quality and self-checking against this new knowledge. Inputs to care were important, but not sufficient to drive improvement. Distilling SRA into a replicable improvement model carries with it the risk of losing contextual and programmatic factors which appear to be key to the success of the program in Tanzania. Implementation and ownership by the government of Tanzania was one of these critical elements.

Identifiers

PMID41811917
PMCPMC12978444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.