Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41811879›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Improved AIS data simplification algorithm for extracting typical routes considering motion continuity.

Jin He, Jinjia Ruan, Yao Tong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jin HeMarine Navigation Support Technology Research Center, China Waterborne Transport Research Institute, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4142-2045
Jinjia RuanMarine Navigation Support Technology Research Center, China Waterborne Transport Research Institute, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5665-0682
Yao TongMarine Navigation Support Technology Research Center, China Waterborne Transport Research Institute, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automatic Identification System (AIS) data provides crucial information about vessel trajectories. However, raw AIS data is often highly redundant, containing overlapping and repetitive routes, which complicates its direct use in maritime applications such as navigation planning and route prediction. In this paper, we propose an improved simplification algorithm designed to extract typical routes while preserving vessel movement continuity. Our approach simplifies complex AIS data by applying an enhanced distance threshold pruning technique and analyzing the continuity of vessel operations to address route segment discontinuities and coordinate deviations.We conducted experiments to evaluate the impact of the simplification algorithm on deep learning applications, specifically in trajectory prediction and anomaly detection. The results demonstrate that the simplified data significantly improves both training efficiency and prediction accuracy in trajectory forecasting models using deep learning, while also enhancing anomaly detection capabilities. Compared to models trained on the original AIS data, those trained on the simplified data achieved faster convergence and higher precision, with fewer false positives in anomaly detection tasks.The findings highlight the practical advantages of the proposed simplification method, making it a valuable tool for real-time maritime monitoring and improving overall operational efficiency. Our code and data at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17568672.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsShipsDeep LearningMotionPrediction Algorithms

Identifiers

PMID41811879
PMCPMC12978504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.