ArticlePloS one2026
An integrated method for lightweight design and additive manufacturing of UAV arms.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Topology optimization and additive manufacturing (AM) have been widely applied to the lightweight design and fabrication of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). However, existing topology optimization methods for UAVs typically assume isotropic materials, neglecting the anisotropy inherent in AM and the associated manufacturing precision constraints. This paper proposes a lightweight integrated method in MATLAB R2021a for the design and AM of UAV arms that simultaneously accounts for printing-induced anisotropy and minimum feature size constraints. A topology optimization model is proposed that uses nodal density and element printing angle as coupled design variables, and the corresponding sensitivity analysis is carried out. In the manufacturing phase, a contour-offset strategy is employed to generate printing paths for the optimized structures, achieving effective force transmission. The effects of manufacturing and optimization parameters on the design results are systematically investigated. The results show that, compared with the traditional optimization method, the compliance difference between the optimized structure obtained by the proposed method and the traditional method is only 0.46%. Furthermore, while ensuring manufacturability, printing efficiency is improved by approximately 69%. This approach establishes a unified design-to-manufacturing workflow, providing both a theoretical foundation and a practical pathway for the intelligent design and efficient fabrication of UAVs and other lightweight structural components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.