Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41811813›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Remnant hollowed out dead coral skeleton branches defer coral community recovery.

Kathryn C Scafidi, Kyle W Fouke, Mayandi Sivaguru, Bruce W Fouke, Peter J Edmunds

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kathryn C ScafidiDepartment of Biology, California State University, Northridge, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7550-0163
Kyle W FoukeDepartment of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Mayandi SivaguruDepartment of Earth Science & Environmental Change, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America.
Bruce W FoukeDepartment of Earth Science & Environmental Change, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America.
Peter J EdmundsDepartment of Biology, California State University, Northridge, California, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Through repeated impacts of ecosystem disturbances, most coral reefs have transitioned to a degraded state with low living coral cover. Until recently, the reefs of Moorea, French Polynesia, have provided an exception to this trend as their coral communities have recovered from sequential disturbances over the last 50 years. Early in 2019, the north shore fore reef at 10-m depth had ~ 75% live coral cover, but was decimated by bleaching to leave 17% coral cover by August 2020 and many kilometers of reef dominated by dead-in-place colonies of Pocillopora spp. By 2025, coral recovery had not begun because of the chronology of decay affecting dead Pocillopora skeletons. We combine ecological analyses of dead Pocillopora colonies with high-resolution microscopy of aragonite skeletal structure to better understand the fate of these dead branching corals. Bleaching in 2019 created a reef dominated by dead Pocillopora colonies that initially were resilient to breakage and removal. Dead corals were colonized by macroalgae, occupied by a unique assemblage of invertebrates, and deterred coral recruitment as evidenced by coral settlers on settlement tiles but not on dead skeletons. In 2022-2023, three years after Pocillopora colonies were killed, their remnant hollowed-out branches were first detected. High-resolution microscopy indicates hollowing occurred through bioerosion of dead branches that were scaffolded by encrusting taxa and entrapped sediments. Over 2011-2019, coral communities in Moorea rapidly recovered from devastation, but recovery from the 2019 bleaching has been deferred by the retention of dead corals on reef surfaces, creating the opportunity for erosion to further hollow out and weaken dead coral branches. This study shows how the synergy of well-studied disturbances can create ecological surprises that at best defer community recovery, but at worst portend a different outcome of major disturbance events, preventing recovery of the original coral community.

Indexed as

AnthozoaCoral ReefsAnimalsCoral BleachingEcosystemPolynesia

Identifiers

PMID41811813
PMCPMC12978499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.