ArticlePloS one2026
Gender and poverty in the United States: Evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy in Women: Epidemiology, Diagnostic Delay, and Clinical Implications.Cardiology and therapy · 2026Review
- Considerations in Alzheimer's Disease in Women.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines gender differences in poverty determinants among single-headed households in the United States using data from the 2022 Survey of Consumer Finances. Using logistic regression with decomposition methods, we analyzed 1,383 households (833 female-headed, 550 male-headed) to identify factors associated with living below the federal poverty threshold. Results reveal significant differences in poverty determinants between men and women. Working for an employer, self-employment, education level, and age were negatively associated with poverty, while fair health status and income uncertainty were positively associated with poverty risk. The decomposition analysis found a statistically significant coefficient effect (p < 0.0001), indicating that the impact of independent variables on poverty likelihood differs by gender. Employment showed a marginally significant differential effect (p = 0.068), with working for an employer having a smaller protective effect against poverty for women compared to men. However, no constant effect was detected, suggesting gender differences in poverty result from differential responses to specific determinants rather than gender itself. Female-headed households were more likely to have dependent children (38.3% versus 12.7%) and report poorer health status, while male-headed households had higher average net worth. These findings suggest that gender-neutral poverty reduction strategies may be insufficient, and that targeted interventions, such as affordable childcare support to enhance labor market participation among low-income women, are needed to effectively address gender disparities in poverty rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.