Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41811760›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2026

Pre-procedural time spent in atrial fibrillation using intermittent ECG monitoring is associated with arrhythmia recurrence after ablation: the ISOLATION cohort study.

Zarina Habibi, Dominique V M Verhaert, Ozan F Özgül, Konstanze Betz, Ben J M Hermans, Suzanne A M Philippens, Sevasti-Maria Chaldoupi, Bart Maesen, Emma Sandgren, Jos G Maessen and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Zarina HabibiDepartment of Physiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0369-7670
Dominique V M VerhaertCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3477-2589
Ozan F ÖzgülDepartment of Physiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4530-6674
Konstanze BetzDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3943-3896
Ben J M HermansCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7780-4427
Suzanne A M PhilippensDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Sevasti-Maria ChaldoupiDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3938-6193
Bart MaesenCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8622-1450
Emma SandgrenCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7410-3246
Jos G MaessenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Aaron J IsaacsDepartment of Physiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5037-4834
Sjoerd W WestraDepartment of Cardiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0165-6151
Robin NijveldtDepartment of Cardiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1530-6363
Stef ZeemeringDepartment of Physiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3738-7328
Kevin VernooyCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8818-5964
Dominik LinzCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4893-0824
Ulrich SchottenDepartment of Physiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1532-3315

Funding

European Union 860974European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme 945260IHI project AF B STEP 101252780Leducq Foundation 2024MAESTRIA: Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence Early Detection Stroke Atrial Fibrillation 965286Netherlands Heart Foundation 01-002-2022-0118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAtrial fibrillation (AF) is conventionally classified as paroxysmal or persistent. AF burden might better reflect response to rhythm-control interventions. This study evaluated the association between estimated pre-procedural time spent in AF and recurrences after AF ablation, compared with conventional AF classification. METHODS AND

resultsIn patients scheduled for AF ablation, clinical characteristics were collected before ablation, and 60-second single-lead ECGs were recorded three times daily (with additional symptom-triggered recordings) for four weeks. Pre-procedural time spent in AF was estimated as the number of days with detected AF divided by total monitoring days. The primary endpoint was AF recurrence between 3 and 12 months post-ablation. Of 302 patients (mean age 64 ± 9 years; 33% female), 201 (67%) had paroxysmal AF and 101 (33%) had persistent AF. After 12 months, recurrence rates were higher in persistent than in paroxysmal AF (37.6% vs. 24.4%, P & 0.01) and in patients with a higher (>32%) vs. lower (≤32%) percentage of time spent in AF (36.4% vs. 24.0%, P < 0.01). Notably, paroxysmal AF patients with a higher percentage of time in AF had recurrence rates comparable to those of patients with persistent AF. Pre-procedural percentage of time in AF independently predicted arrhythmia recurrence at 12-month follow-up (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.0-1.1; P & 0.025).

conclusionA higher pre-procedural percentage of time spent in AF derived from 60-second single-lead ECGs is independently associated with atrial arrhythmia recurrence after ablation. Assessing the percentage of pre-procedural time spent in AF might help identify paroxysmal AF patients with a high AF recurrence risk in future studies.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationElectrocardiographyElectrocardiography, AmbulatoryAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRecurrenceRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAblationAF burdenAtrial fibrillationRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID41811760
PMCPMC13008584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.