ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026
Autopsy findings of inferior vena cava filter perforation: a forensic analysis of retroperitoneal hemorrhage and medical liability.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) reduces the risk of fatal pulmonary embolism but carries risks of severe complications. A 63-year-old hypertensive female with lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis underwent IVCF placement and anticoagulation. On postoperative day 9, the patient developed sudden nausea and abdominal distension, which progressed rapidly to hemorrhagic shock and death. This led to lawsuits for medical malpractice. Autopsy revealed IVCF migration and perforation, which caused inferior vena cava (IVC) perforation and retroperitoneal hematoma. Hemorrhagic shock was confirmed as the cause of death by autopsy and histopathological analysis. Anticoagulation plausibly increased bleeding, whereas hypertension masked early signs of hypotension. This fatal case highlights the critical need for vigilance toward atypical postoperative symptoms (e.g., abdominal distension) and mandates rigorous imaging surveillance (e.g., early computed tomography (CT) angiography) and coagulation monitoring to prevent lethal complications. Autopsy can clarify the cause of death, inform clinical risk management, and promote medicolegal resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41811687What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.