Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41811678›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2026

Critical Appraisal of Artificial Intelligence for Rare-Event Recognition: Principles and Pharmacovigilance Case Studies.

G Niklas Norén, Eva-Lisa Meldau, Johan Ellenius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. How is AI developing in pharmacovigilance?Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

G Niklas NorénUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden. niklas.noren@who-umc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4595-230X
Eva-Lisa MeldauUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0268-7769
Johan ElleniusUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6447-8415

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many high-stakes artificial intelligence (AI) applications target low-prevalence events, where apparent accuracy can conceal limited real-world value. Relevant AI models range from expert-defined rules and traditional machine learning to generative large language models (LLMs) constrained for classification. As the effort and expertise required to develop modern AI decrease, there is a risk that organizations devote too little time to understanding their limitations and sources of error. We outline key dimensions for critical appraisal of AI in rare-event recognition, including problem framing and test set design, prevalence-aware statistical evaluation, robustness assessment, and integration into human workflows. In addition, we propose an approach to structured case-level examination (SCLE), to complement statistical performance evaluation, and a set of considerations to guide procurement or development of AI models for rare-event recognition. We instantiate the framework in pharmacovigilance, drawing on three studies: rule-based retrieval of pregnancy-related reports, duplicate detection combining machine learning with probabilistic record linkage, and automated redaction of person names using an LLM. We highlight pitfalls specific to the rare-event setting including optimism from unrealistic class balance and lack of difficult positive controls in test sets-and show how cost-sensitive targets align model performance with operational value. While grounded in pharmacovigilance practice, the principles generalize to domains where positives are scarce, and error costs may be asymmetric.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsGenerative Artificial IntelligencePharmacovigilanceFemaleHumansLarge Language ModelsMachine LearningPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41811678
PMCPMC13263267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.