Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41811648›Full record

ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2026

Redefining the Paradigm: Advancing Evidence-Based Return-to-Sport Criteria Following Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.

Emanuele Tortoli, Alice Gerini, Leonardo Pellicciari, Alli Gokeler

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emanuele TortoliDepartment of Medicine and Health Science "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy. emanuele.tortoli@unimol.it.ORCID 0000-0001-9470-4903
Alice Gerini, Turin, Italy.
Leonardo PellicciariIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9521-3759
Alli GokelerDepartment of Applied Neuroscience in Sports and Exercise, Institute of Sports Medicine, University of Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6427-4225

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcute posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries occur during high-impact sports including American Football, soccer, and skiing. While many of these injuries can be managed nonsurgically, surgery is necessary in some cases, particularly in cases of instability. Clear and standardized return-to-sport (RTS) criteria during rehabilitation following PCL reconstruction (PCL-R) are lacking.

objectivesThis scoping review aims to identify and analyze existing RTS guidelines for PCL-R and propose improvements on the basis of frameworks from anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, laying the groundwork for future research.

methodsFollowing the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, studies were included if they evaluated RTS criteria after isolated PCL-R in adult athletes. The search strategy involved a three-step approach, including initially limited searches, keyword identification, and a final comprehensive search of five electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and PEDro). The inclusion criteria encompassed studies involving athletes aged > 18 with isolated PCL-R. Exclusion criteria were studies involving multi-ligament injuries, revision surgeries, or nonEnglish publications.

resultsA total of 13 studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting diverse RTS criteria. RTS timelines were mentioned in four studies (31%), generally ranging from less than 6 up to 12 months. Clinical criteria, including range of motion (ROM) and pain, were reported in eight studies (63%). Full knee extension and near-complete flexion recovery were generally required before RTS, although specific flexion thresholds were not consistently defined. In addition, the absence of pain or the presence of only minimal pain was commonly expected before clearance. Strength assessments were included in five studies (38%), and were frequently assessed via isokinetic testing, with only one study adopting a limb symmetry index (LSI) ≥ 90% as a clearance criterion. Performance criteria, such as hop tests, were used in four studies (31%), often employing a LSI threshold of over 90%. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed in 11 studies (85%). Scores such as the IKDC and Lysholm demonstrated significant postsurgical improvements, often exceeding 90 and 85, respectively, at the time of RTS.

conclusionsThis review highlights the absence of standardized RTS criteria following PCL-R. Clinicians should consider integrating objective criteria when assessing RTS, including full ROM recovery, minimal or no pain, quadriceps and hamstring strength symmetry of ≥ 90% LSI, performance-based tests such as hop tests (commonly using an LSI > 90%), and PROMs (e.g., IKDC > 90, Lysholm > 85).

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesPosterior Cruciate LigamentPosterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionReturn to SportHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.