ArticleGeroScience2026
Sex differences in stroke prognosis across reperfusion strategies: implications for prevention and quality of life.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sex-specific trajectories of vascular aging may influence stroke recovery, yet their impact on access to reperfusion and long-term outcomes remains uncertain. We analysed 3760 consecutive patients with angiography-confirmed cerebral vessel occlusion transferred for endovascular therapy (EVT) between 2015 and 2022. Women accounted for 45.1% of patients and were significantly older (median 77 vs. 70 years) with greater baseline stroke severity (NIHSS 14 vs. 12). Access to acute stroke care was equivalent across sexes, including workflow intervals, intravenous thrombolysis, EVT use, and angiographic success (TICI 2b-3). In the full cohort, 12-month survival did not differ between sexes (log-rank p = 0.38). After 1:1 propensity score matching for age and NIHSS (1302 matched pairs), women showed markedly better 12-month survival (log-rank p < 0.0001). Among EVT-treated patients (n = 2795), functional independence at 90 days was similar (mRS 0-2 in 49.2% of men vs. 47.8% of women; p = 0.58), while procedural safety profiles were largely comparable, with lower rates of PH2 haemorrhage in women (3.1% vs. 4.9%; p = 0.016). In a multivariable Cox model adjusting for comorbidities, intravenous thrombolysis, and reperfusion success, female sex remained independently associated with reduced 12-month mortality (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.89; p < 0.001). These findings suggest a robust female survival advantage despite older age and similar access to modern reperfusion therapies. The results may implicate the presence of sex-specific resilience mechanisms relevant to vascular aging and postischaemic recovery, with implications for prevention and long-term poststroke management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41811622What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.