ArticleSports medicine - open2026
Sharpening the Coach's Eye: An Observational Study Investigating the Trainability of An Eye-Tracking Strategy for Perceiving Barbell Velocity Loss in Resistance Training.
Article in Sports medicine - open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResistance training (RT) coaches can implement velocity-based training (VBT) to prescribe set volume by terminating sets at a target velocity loss (VL) threshold. However, VBT necessitates velocity-tracking devices that demand time and expertise. In a previous study, we asked RT coaches to detect VL thresholds using solely their observational judgment - the Coach's Eye. We found improved accuracy when participants spontaneously used a "bar strategy" (focusing on the barbell). Here, we investigated whether coaches could be trained to intentionally use this strategy and whether it would be associated with greater accuracy in detecting VL thresholds.
methodsTwenty RT coaches completed one experimental session involving a gaze strategy training intervention. Participants watched an instructional video on the bar strategy, practiced with gaze feedback, and completed a VL detection task. The task involved watching videos of trainees performing bench presses and back squats and detecting 20% and 40% VL thresholds. We examined the frequency of bar strategy use using a one-sided exact binomial test and the accuracy in VL thresholds detection using a negative binomial mixed-effects model.
resultsParticipants used the bar strategy in most trials (mean proportion = 78.81, 95% CI [0.75, 1.00]). The average absolute error in detecting VL thresholds was 1.5 (SD = 2.3) repetitions. Error decreased when using the bar strategy (-1.23, 95% CI [-1.99, -0.03]), detecting 40% VL thresholds (-1.60, 95% CI [-1.88, -1.26]) compared to 20%, and observing sets loaded with 85% 1RM (-1.59, 95% CI [-1.93, -1.16]) but not with 65% 1RM (-0.48, 95% CI [-1.01, 0.18]) compared to 45% 1RM. Lastly, mental fatigue did not significantly affect accuracy (-0.01, 95% CI [-0.03, 0.01]).
conclusionsThis study provides novel evidence that, under laboratory conditions, RT coaches can be trained to use a gaze strategy associated with improved accuracy in detecting barbell VL. Thus, the Coach's Eye may offer a practical, coach-led complement to velocity-tracking devices in VBT, with further studies in real-world settings required to establish its ecological validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.