Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41811568›Full record

SynthesisHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026

One operation, two challenges: systematic review and single arm proportional meta-analysis of concurrent enterocutaneous fistula takedown and ventral hernia repair.

Gabriela Lyons, Vitor Dos Santos Neves, Luiza da Silva de Carvalho, Isabella Wuillaume Marino, Marina Eguchi, Raquel Nogueira, Salvatore Jr Docimo, Diego L Lima, Flavio Malcher

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gabriela LyonsFaculdade Souza Marques, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Vitor Dos Santos NevesHospital Municipal Lourenço Jorge, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Luiza da Silva de CarvalhoUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Isabella Wuillaume MarinoPontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marina EguchiDepartment of Surgery, Federal University of São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Raquel NogueiraMontefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Salvatore Jr DocimoDepartment of Surgery, University of South Florida, Florida, USA.
Diego L LimaMontefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA. dilaurentino@gmail.com.
Flavio MalcherLenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnterocutaneous fistula (ECF) is an abnormal connection between the gastrointestinal tract and skin, often arising postoperatively or due to inflammatory diseases, malignancies, trauma, or radiation. Based on etiology, anatomical factors, and patient conditions, their management can differ. Patients with ECF frequently present with concurrent ventral hernia. Repairing the hernia during ECF takedown is debated due to contamination, dense adhesions, and prior operations that raise complication and recurrence risks. This study aims to analyze the treatment of ventral hernia in patients with ECF focusing on postoperative complications, including surgical site infection, hernia recurrence, fistula recurrence, reoperation, and mortality.

methodsThe study was conducted following a comprehensive search in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. A search strategy was performed until its conclusion in March 2025. Studies including patients ≥ 18 years with ECF and ventral, or incisional hernia were eligible. Data on patient demographics, ECF etiology, treatment strategies, surgical outcomes, recurrence and mortality were extracted and analyzed individually. Single-arm proportional meta-analyses were performed in R. Mortality was pooled with a binomial GLMM (logit). Surgical Site Infection (SSI), hernia recurrence, fistula recurrence, and reoperation used inverse-variance random-effects models on the logit scale. Results are reported as pooled proportions with 95% CIs. Quality assessment was evaluated with the ROBINS-I tool.

resultsThe initial search provided 1,115 studies, and 9 met the inclusion criteria after screening and full-text analysis. A total of 697 patients were analyzed in the included studies, with a mean age of 57 years (standard deviation of 14.9), 55.1% male, and an average body mass index of 28.5 kg/m2 (SD 7.3). All patients underwent simultaneous ECF treatment and abdominal wall repair. Mesh was used in 476 patients (68.3%), including 265 biologic (38%), 169 synthetic (24.2%), 42 biosynthetic (6.1%). Pooled rates were: SSI 41% (95% CI: 0.28–0.56; I² = 85.6%), hernia recurrence 27% (95% CI: 0.19–0.37; I² = 81.4%), fistula recurrence 9% (95% CI: 0.05–0.16; I² = 71.8%), reoperation 14% (95% CI: 0.07–0.26; I² = 86.6%), and mortality 2% (95% CI: 0.01–0.06; I² = 12.4%). Follow up varied from 1 to 153 months across the studies.

conclusionThe management of ECF in the context of abdominal wall repair remains challenging, with high rates of SSI, hernia and fistula recurrence. Mesh reinforcement, predominantly in a sublay position, was used in most cases, yet recurrence rates highlight the need of a better timing for a proper surgical repair.

Indexed as

Hernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyIntestinal FistulaHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceReoperationSurgical MeshSurgical Wound InfectionEnterocutaneous fistulaVentral hernia repair, treatment outcomes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.