Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41811507›Full record

ReviewPlanta2026

Hybrid seed production: new paradigms and challenges in the twenty-first century.

Mukund Kumar Thakur, Saurabh Pandey, Satish Kumar Singh, Sumeet Kumar Singh, Ashutosh Singh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Planta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Integrative Techniques for Hybrid Breeding inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mukund Kumar ThakurDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur, Bihar, 848125, India.
Saurabh PandeyDepartment of Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Indira Gandhi Agriculture University, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492012, India.
Satish Kumar SinghDepartment of Seed Science and Technology, PGCA, RPCAU-Pusa, Samastipur, Bihar, 848125, India.
Sumeet Kumar SinghDepartment of Seed Science and Technology, PGCA, RPCAU-Pusa, Samastipur, Bihar, 848125, India.
Ashutosh SinghCentre for Advanced Studies On Climate Change, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur, Bihar, 848125, India. ashutosh@rpcau.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9431-6548

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionHybrid seed technology future depends on integrating advanced genomics, AI-driven breeding, and enabling policies to sustainably delivery climate-resilient, high-performing hybrids with broad accessibility and equitable benefits worldwide. Hybrid seeds, which exploit heterosis, have driven agricultural productivity gains since the 1920s. Understanding the genetics and molecular biology of hybrid generation led to the development of modern hybrid systems. With time, modern hybrid systems integrated advanced genomic tools such as CRISPR/Cas, marker-assisted selection (MAS), and genomic selection (GS) with established technologies like cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS), restorer-of-fertility (Rf) systems, and chemical hybridizing agents (CHAs) for better hybrid production in a shorter time. Moreover, the integration of emerging approaches leveraging artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) for trait prediction, multi-parent populations to expand genetic diversity, and epigenetics to engineer climate-resilient hybrids with enhanced stress tolerance is also being explored. However, regulatory hurdles, such as divergent global policies for genetically modified (GM) hybrids, intellectual property (IP) disputes, and restricted germplasm exchange under access-and-benefit-sharing frameworks like the Nagoya Protocol, hinder innovation. Climate change exacerbates both biotic and abiotic stresses, disrupts production zones, and threatens pollinator-dependent crops, while socio-economic barriers limit the adoption of smallholder farming. Case studies of different crops demonstrate the success of hybrids, yet gaps in scalability and accessibility persist. Overall, realizing the potential of hybrid technology hinges on sustained collaboration across scientific, industrial, and policy domains to overcome technical, environmental, and socio-economic constraints. This review examines various techniques for hybrid production that incorporate genomics, future advancements, and synergies between synthetic biology, automation, and predictive breeding, as well as policies that strike a balance between intellectual property protection and germplasm accessibility for hybrid seed production.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalHybridization, GeneticPlant BreedingSeedsGenomicsHybrid VigorPlants, Genetically ModifiedGenome editingGenomicsGM hybridsHybrid seed productionMarker-assisted selection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.