Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41811458›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2026

The role of artificial intelligence in paediatric abdominal imaging.

Ione Limantoro, Samual Stafrace, Ilze Apine, Carmelo Sofia, Seema Toso, Damjana Kljucevsek, Giulia Perucca

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ione LimantoroDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, 3000, Belgium. ione.limantoro@uzleuven.be.
Samual StafraceDepartment of Radiology, McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, Canada.
Ilze ApineDepartment of Radiology, Children's Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.
Carmelo SofiaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Morphologic and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Seema TosoDivison of radiology, Department of Diagnostics, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Damjana KljucevsekDepartment of Radiology, University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Giulia PeruccaDepartment of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly shaping radiology, though its integration into paediatric radiology has progressed more slowly due to challenges specific to the paediatric population. This is especially true in the field of paediatric abdominal imaging. Key barriers include regulatory and ethical issues, the scarcity of large paediatric datasets necessary for algorithm training, reduced vendor interest linked to limited economic incentives, and the inherent differences in children throughout the developmental stages including organ size, signal/sonographic characteristics, and pathologies. Despite these obstacles, AI has the potential to enhance clinical care by augmenting radiologists' workflow across both interpretive and non-interpretive tasks. Currently, most published research focuses on AI's role in musculoskeletal imaging. Although AI is expanding its reach in other imaging domains, paediatric imaging lags behind, as does its potential in abdominal imaging. The use of AI in paediatric abdominal imaging has received limited attention in the existing literature. Emerging research applications cover multiple tasks: detection, classification, functional analysis, severity prediction, automated segmentation, image quality optimization, and acceleration of image acquisition. This review aims to provide practicing radiologists with a concise, simple, and clinically oriented overview of the potential applications and limitations of these new AI tools in paediatric abdominal imaging, categorized by organ. For the time being, most applications described in the literature remain confined to the research setting. To advance these approaches towards clinical utility, validation on larger and more heterogeneous datasets is required. Moving forward, it will be essential to integrate human expertise with AI systems to strengthen diagnostic capacity in paediatric abdominal radiology and to promote paediatric-specific regulatory standards, clear governance structures, and human-centred oversight.

Indexed as

AbdomenArtificial IntelligenceDiagnostic ImagingPediatricsRadiography, AbdominalChildHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedAbdomenArtificial intelligenceChildDeep learning - diagnostic imagingMachine learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.