ArticleJAMA network open2026
Precision Diagnosis in APOL1 Kidney Disease With the p.N264K M1 Protective Variant.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
45 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: The APOL1 M1 (p.N264K) variant protects against G2-associated APOL1 focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the utility of knowing an individual's M1 status in guiding kidney disease diagnosis and other clinical scenarios remains underexplored. Objective: To test 2 hypotheses: (1) in patients with APOL1 high-risk (HR) genotype kidney disease with at least 1 G2 allele, M1 can distinguish APOL1 CKD from non-APOL1 CKD; (2) in people with APOL1 low-risk (LR) genotypes, M1 is independently associated with protection against FSGS and CKD. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective case-control study using data from 2 tertiary care hospitals (Columbia University Irving Medical Center and Mass General Brigham Biobank) and population-based data (the UK Biobank [UKB], Electronic Medical Records and Genomics [eMERGE-III], and All of Us [AoU]). Participants were individuals with a diagnosis of FSGS or steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS), individuals with CKD, and controls. Exposures: Exposures included the M1 variant (p.N264K) obtained from exome or genome sequencing data, sex, and genetic ancestry. Main outcome and measure: The main outcome was the presence or absence of kidney disease, defined as FSGS or non-FSGS CKD, compared with non-kidney disease controls. Association between the M1 variant and disease status was assessed using odds ratios (ORs). Results: A total of 107 696 individuals (54 994 [51.1%] female; 8779 [8.2%] with African ancestry, 78 475 [72.9%] with European ancestry, and 16 129 [15.0%] with multiethnic ancestry), including 3460 with FSGS or SRNS, 24 382 with non-FSGS CKD kidney disease, and 79 854 controls were enrolled in the discovery cohort. In the APOL1-HR group (1413 participants), M1 was significantly inversely associated with FSGS or SRNS cases compared with controls without kidney disease (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.04-0.63; P = 3.69 × 10-3). Among individuals with CKD with APOL1-HR genotypes, M1 was 4 times more frequent in those whose CKD was not due to FSGS or SRNS. Importantly, electronic health record and biopsy review identified an alternative, non-APOL1 cause for CKD in nearly all APOL1-HR-M1 cases. There was no association between individuals with APOL1-LR genotypes with M1 and protection against CKD or FSGS. Conclusions and relevance: In this case-control study of 107 696 individuals, presence of an APOL1-HR genotype M1 was significantly associated with protection against kidney disease, suggesting that it may have a role as a genetic modifier. Patients with CKD with an APOL1-HR genotype and M1 should be evaluated for an alternative and potentially treatable cause of their CKD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.