Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41811212›Full record

ArticleInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Single Port Robotic Extraperitoneal Distal Ureterectomy and Ureteral Reimplantation via Lower Anterior Approach.

Arianna Biasatti, Savio D Pandolfo, Rocco Damiano, Marco De Sio, Ciro Imbimbo, Riccardo Autorino

Abstract readCase ReportsVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arianna BiasattiDepartment of Medicine, Urological Clinic, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Savio D PandolfoDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Rocco DamianoDepartment of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Marco De SioDepartment of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, Urology Unit, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Ciro ImbimboDepartment of Neurosciences, Sciences of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Riccardo AutorinoSection of Robotic Surgery, Glickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSingle Port (SP) Robotic Extraperitoneal approach enhances maneuverability in the narrow extraperitoneal space while preserving peritoneal integrity (1, 2). First reports show reduced postoperative pain, fewer gastrointestinal complications and shorter hospital stay compared to multiport or open techniques (3-5). Recent experiences with robotic ureteral reconstruction have further supported the feasibility of advanced reconstructive procedures in selected patients (6-8) but literature on SP platform remains limited (9, 10), therefore we present this innovative technique. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe report the case of a 44-year-old female (BMI 29.1 kg/m²), with medical history of fibromyalgia, who presented with right-sided back pain and nausea. CT-urogram showed severe right hydroureteronephrosis with a distal ureteral stricture and diffuse ureteral thickening, without a clear obstructing lesion. Diagnostic ureteroscopy revealed luminal narrowing due to wall thickening, without papillary masses. Biopsies and urine cytology were negative for urothelial carcinoma. A double-J stent was placed, and SP robotic distal ureterectomy with ureteral reimplantation was scheduled.

resultsLow Anterior Access (LAA) was obtained through a 4-cm incision at the McBurney point. The retroperitoneal space was bluntly developed to identify the psoas muscle as anatomical landmark; the ureter was dissected caudally and resected at the level of the stricture. The bladder was then reached for cystotomy and ureteral reimplantation. Operative time was 160 minutes. No complications occurred and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 1. Final pathology revealed endometriosis. The ureteral stent was removed after 4 weeks; at 3-month follow-up the patient was asymptomatic, renal function was normal, and CT scan showed no right hydroureteronephrosis.

conclusionRobotic SP extraperitoneal approach appears safe, feasible, and promising for ureteral reconstruction, combining retroperitoneal access with SP system dexterity and potentially reducing postoperative morbidity and hospital stay.

Indexed as

ReplantationRobotic Surgical ProceduresUreterAdultFemaleHumansTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID41811212
PMCPMC13400075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.