Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41811112›Full record

ArticleNursing ethics2026

The gift of love: A contemporary view of love in end-of-life nursing care.

Peter Stuart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Peter StuartSchool of Health and Care, Coventry University - Coventry Campus, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8454-2899

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundHistorically love in nursing has been expressed as tender loving care but a move to technological thinking in nursing and the integration of healthcare systems may have changed this to one where love may be distant or avoided from the arena of care. It may now uncertain if love in nursing is an essential part of care, or supererogatory and additional to a paid duty of care.Research aimA study was conducted to investigate hospital nurses' experiences of providing end-of-life care. A core theme from the study was the nurse's expression of love. This article reports on this outcome and aims to provide clarity regarding the current nature of love in nurses' care.Research designInterpretative phenomenology was used to explore hospital nurses' experiences of providing end-of-life care.Participants and research context6 UK registered nurses with experience of hospital end-of-life care took part.Ethical considerationsEthical approval was gained before commencing the study. All participants consented to take part.FindingsThe nurses' end-of-life care actions were done willingly with goodness, selflessness, sometime courage, placing others before themselves and going beyond their duty of care. As a consequence, their love is universal and not bound by a professional care ethic but given freely of themselves as a gift.DiscussionThe nurses' action described love as both agape and eros suggesting a universal love. This was suggested a love not bound by a professional care ethic but one given freely of themselves as a gift.ConclusionsA contemporary view of love in nursing care is presented; when caring for dying vulnerable people in hospital, the value of love for another person is prevalent in the nursing care provided. It is not bound by a duty to care but is an addition to the process of care and is given freely of self.

Indexed as

LoveTerminal CareAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansNurse-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchUnited Kingdomcare ethicsloveolder personsPalliative carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID41811112
PMCPMC13415902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.