ArticleClinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)2026
Who Should Lead Academia Today? Rethinking Leadership Across Career Stages.
Article in Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leadership in academic institutions and professional societies plays a critical role in shaping the future of scholarship, governance, and educational equity. However, a persistent trend, particularly in long-established organizations, reveals that retired faculty, such as professors emeriti, often fill executive leadership roles. While emeriti may continue to offer valuable mentorship and institutional memory, their appointment to decision-making positions raises significant structural and ethical concerns. This commentary critiques the reliance on retired academics for active leadership, highlighting key risks including diminished accountability, generational disconnection, ethical incongruence, and leadership bottlenecks that impede the advancement of early- and mid-career scholars. Drawing on governance literature and demographic data, the article calls for structural reforms that promote active, inclusive, and forward-looking leadership models. Practical recommendations include revising governance bylaws, establishing advisory roles for emeriti, and fostering intergenerational partnerships to ensure sustainable academic leadership. The future of academia cannot be led solely by the past. It must be shared by those actively engaged in its present with the assistance of those who have experience in such roles before retirement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.