ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2026
Comparative evaluation of sputum microscopy and Xpert MTB/RIF assay for tuberculosis detection and rifampicin resistance surveillance in Biratnagar, Nepal.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) control in Nepal faces persistent challenges due to underdiagnosis and increasing drug resistance. This study assessed the diagnostic performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay compared with conventional smear microscopy and estimated the prevalence of rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB) in Biratnagar, a high-burden urban center. Between March and September 2023, 509 clinical specimens from TB suspects were analyzed by Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) staining, fluorescence microscopy (FM), and Xpert MTB/RIF. Using Xpert as the operational reference, ZN and FM exhibited overall sensitivities of 55.9% (89/159) and 68.5% (109/159), respectively. In paired sputum-only analyses (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.