Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41810922›Full record

SynthesisAustralian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc2026

Effect of Endodontic Sealers on the Bond Strength of Glass Fibre Posts: A Systematic Review.

Thiago Bessa Marconato Antunes, Juliana D Bronzato, Vanessa Gallego Arias Pecorari, Jennifer Santos Pereira, Talita Tartari, Adriana de Jesus Soares, Brenda P F A Gomes, Marina Angélica Marciano

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thiago Bessa Marconato AntunesDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Piracicaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6594-3948
Juliana D BronzatoDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Piracicaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8249-7916
Vanessa Gallego Arias PecorariDepartment of Social Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Piracicaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Jennifer Santos PereiraDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Piracicaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Talita TartariDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Piracicaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Adriana de Jesus SoaresDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Piracicaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Brenda P F A GomesDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Piracicaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Marina Angélica MarcianoDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Piracicaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6244-2531

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2017/25090-3Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2021/07920-4Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2021/11992-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review evaluated the influence of resin-based, eugenol-based and bioceramic endodontic sealers on the bond strength of glass fibre posts cemented with resin cements. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and Embase, including in vitro studies using human or bovine teeth restored with fibre posts. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIN Tool. Thirty three studies met the eligibility criteria. Most evidence indicates that resin-based sealers promote higher bond strength values than eugenol-based sealers, whereas findings for bioceramic sealers were inconsistent. Only a minority of studies showed a low risk of bias, while most presented moderate methodological limitations. Substantial heterogeneity was also observed, including differences in irrigation protocols, sealer types, adhesive strategies and post-cementation intervals. Within the limitations of the available evidence, resin-based sealers appear to be the most favourable choice for clinical fibre post cementation. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42023467018.

Indexed as

Dental BondingGlassPost and Core TechniqueRoot Canal Filling MaterialsAnimalsHumansPolymersResin CementsSilicon DioxidefiberglassPolymersResin CementsRoot Canal Filling MaterialsSilicon Dioxidefibreglass postpush‐outresin cementsroot canal filling materialssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41810922
PMCPMC13436227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.