ArticleBehavioural neurology2026
Nonlinear Association of Daily Sitting Time With Depression Risk in US Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Behavioural neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nonlinear Association of Daily Sitting Time With Depression Risk in US Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.Behavioural neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies have examined the relationship between daily sitting time and depression, yet the specific dose-response relationship remains unclear.
methodsThis study analyzed data from 29,691 participants in the 2007-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). To delve into the possible nonlinear link between daily sitting time and depression, smooth curve fitting and threshold effect analysis were utilized in the study. Information on daily sitting time was collected through questionnaires, and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) was employed to measure depression.
resultsIn the fully adjusted Model 3, each additional hour of sitting was associated with a 5% increase in the risk of depression (95% CI: 1.02, 1.07, p = 0.0002). When categorizing daily sitting time, participants who sat for 8 h or more daily exhibited a significantly higher risk of depression across all models. In Model 3, this group had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.37 (95% CI: 1.12, 1.69, p = 0.0039) compared with the reference group sitting for less than 4 h. The threshold effect analysis identified 7 h as the inflection point. Below this threshold, no significant correlation was observed. In contrast, when daily sitting time exceeded the threshold, there was a significant increase in the risk of depression, with an OR of 1.07 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.12, p = 0.0184).
conclusionsA nonlinear association exists between daily sitting time and depression risk in US adults. However, additional research is required to further validate this finding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.