ArticleBehavioural neurology2026
Social Cognition in Multiple Sclerosis: A Multidomain Investigation.
Article in Behavioural neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Social Cognition in Multiple Sclerosis: A Multidomain Investigation.Behavioural neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis has been extensively studied, the presence of social cognition deficits in persons affected by relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) remains comparatively less explored. This study recruited 30 Turkish patients with RRMS and 30 healthy controls (HCs) matched for demographic characteristics and cognitive status. We tested their social cognition abilities within two main subdomains, namely, theory of mind (ToM) and emotion recognition. The combination of tests we used was novel and rather broad as ToM was evaluated in both its affective and cognitive components while emotion recognition was evaluated in two tasks requiring either naming or discriminating facial expressions. All tests required verbal responses and were scored in terms of accuracy. The results indicated that patients with RRMS exhibited significantly lower accuracy compared to the HC group across all social cognition tasks. Correlation analyses revealed a significant negative relationship between emotion discrimination performance and both level of disability and disease duration. Additionally, RRMS patients showed significant deficits in recognizing negative emotions, while no differences with the HC group were observed for positive emotion recognition. The presence of a domain-specific, selective deficit for social cognition was also confirmed after further controlling for overall cognitive functioning. Our findings capitalize on previous evidence demonstrating that social cognition impairments in RRMS have domain-specific characteristics and can be reliably detected in a new cultural context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.