ArticleInternational wound journal2026
Educational Value and Reliability of Exosome Therapy Videos on YouTube: A Cross-Sectional Quality Assessment.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exosome therapy has emerged in recent years as a promising acellular approach for the treatment of tissue regeneration and wound healing. Initial preclinical investigations have demonstrated accelerated fibroblast proliferation, improved angiogenesis and reduced scar formation. It is evident that patients are more likely to gain an understanding of these treatments and acquire information from digital platforms as opposed to from peer-reviewed scientific publications. This study assessed the credibility and instructional merit of exosome therapy content on YouTube, a prominent source of online health information. A cross-sectional study was performed on the initial 50 videos in English obtained using the keyword 'exosome therapy' (15 July 2025). The videos were independently assessed by two plastic surgeons and a dermatologist using three validated scoring systems. The scoring system was based on the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) reference criteria for transparency and reliability, the Global Quality Score (GQS) for overall educational quality and the modified DISCERN tool for content reliability and balance. The median scores obtained were consistently low (DISCERN: 2.67; GQS: 2.67; JAMA: 2.00). However, videos created by doctors exhibited a statistically significant higher average score compared to videos published by patients, companies and YouTubers (p < 0.05). A robust positive correlation was identified between DISCERN and GQS (ρ = 0.95, p < 0.001). Despite the substantial experimental evidence that confirms the efficacy of exosome therapy for acute and chronic wounds, none of the videos addressed the recognised wound healing applications of exosome therapy. In contrast, the contents primarily focus on cosmetic enhancement, anti-ageing interventions and beauty-related applications. The discrepancy between the scientific advancements in the fields of regenerative medicine, dermatology and plastic surgery and the accessibility of online educational resources, highlights the necessity for professional health organisations to furnish accessible, evidence-based materials that accurately demonstrate the therapeutic potential of exosomes in wound healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.