Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41810842›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Intervention Opportunities to Increase the Delivery of Guideline-Concordant Fertility Discussions for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.

Julia Stal, Charleen I Roche, Serena Y Yi, David R Freyer, Jennifer W Mack, Ann H Partridge, Kimberly A Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julia StalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7911-7388
Charleen I RocheDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-5916-6503
Serena Y YiDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
David R FreyerDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5280-990X
Jennifer W MackDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Ann H PartridgeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Kimberly A MillerDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0742-3730

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionClinical practice organizations have developed evidence-based guidelines to structure oncofertility care delivery and mitigate fertility impairment after cancer. However, fertility care remains a leading unmet need for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer, and implementation of guidelines in practice is poorly understood. This study aims to identify intervention opportunities to improve the delivery of guideline-concordant oncofertility counseling for AYAs with cancer from the perspectives of oncologists.MethodsOncologists who treat AYAs with cancer at risk for infertility at an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center in California were recruited to participate in a virtual, semi-structured qualitative interview. Opportunities for interventions were identified following a thematic analysis.ResultsData/thematic saturation was achieved through 12 interviews with oncologists (66.7% female, 41.7% White and 41.7% Asian, in practice for an average of 14.3 years). To increase delivery of guideline-concordant oncofertility counseling for AYAs with cancer, oncologists reported opportunities for: (1) enhancements to electronic care systems (e.g., reminders to discuss fertility with young patients, automatic referrals for fertility-related care, expedited oncofertility consults); (2) dedicated personnel and time (e.g., appointing a specific person to discuss fertility, allocating dedicated time to discuss fertility); and (3) oncologist education (e.g., related to financial considerations, fertility preservation, availability of oncofertility-related resources within the care setting, patient preferences and experiences).DiscussionThis study identified oncologists' perspectives on opportunities for interventions to improve guideline-concordant oncofertility counseling for AYAs with cancer, providing actionable insights into targets for change across both provider- and system-level domains. Notably, identified interventions depend upon institutional commitments to prioritize oncofertility. Without systemic efforts to improve care, oncofertility will likely remain a prominent unmet need for AYAs with cancer.

Indexed as

CounselingFertility PreservationNeoplasmsAdolescentAdultFemaleFertilityHumansMalePractice Guidelines as TopicYoung Adultadolescents and young adults (AYA)cancer care deliverycancer survivorshiponcofertilityreproductive health

Identifiers

PMID41810842
PMCPMC12979896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.