ArticleTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease
Efficacy and safety of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial lung biopsy in peripheral pulmonary lesions without guide sheath and fluoroscopy.
Article in Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRadial probe endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial lung biopsy (rEBUS-TBLB) enables accurate and safe sampling of small peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) inaccessible to conventional flexible bronchoscopy. Although widely adopted and effective, the standard approach using fluoroscopic guidance and a guide sheath (GS) has limitations, including reduced instrument flexibility, greater procedural complexity, and higher demands for equipment and radiation safety.
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy and safety of rEBUS-TBLB technique performed without the use of a GS or fluoroscopy in patients with PPLs.
designThis was a prospective, interventional, non-controlled study conducted in 67 patients with PPLs of unknown etiology that could not be accessed by flexible bronchoscopy for diagnostic sampling. All patients were admitted to the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Military Hospital 175, between February 2024 and March 2025.
methodsrEBUS-TBLB was performed by two experienced pulmonologists. Primary outcomes included the specimen acquisition rate, number, and quality, while secondary outcomes comprised diagnostic yield, complication rates, and the association of chest CT and rEBUS lesion characteristics with diagnostic performance. Data were collected at admission and throughout hospitalization using a standardized medical record format.
resultsThe mean age of the patients was 62.03 ± 9.8 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 2.7:1. Solid nodular lung lesions accounted for 73.1% of cases. The mean lesion size was 42 ± 14 mm, and the mean distance from the lesion to the pleura was 8.5 ± 12 mm (range, 0-45 mm). All lesions were sampled using rEBUS-TBLB, with ⩾3 specimens obtained in 90% of cases. Histopathological diagnoses were achieved in 74.6% of cases, of which 84% were lung cancer and 16% were tuberculosis. The most common complication observed was mild localized bleeding.
conclusionThe rEBUS-TBLB technique, even without GS and fluoroscopy support, remains a highly effective and safe diagnostic approach for PPLs, particularly for malignant lesions and those ⩾20 mm in size. This technique may be appropriate for wider implementation in hospitals with limited equipment and financial resources, provided that flexible bronchoscopy systems, rEBUS equipment, and adequately trained personnel are available.
trial registrationThe study was approved by an independent ethics committee (Ethics Committee of Military Hospital 175, No. 2637/QĐ-BV) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.