Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41810677›Full record

ArticleMemorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz2026

Evaluation of the insecticide custody chain and its relationship with malaria burden in the Brazilian Amazon: a process and exploratory impact assessment (2019-2023)

Marcela Lima Dourado, Rafaella Albuquerque E Silva, Márcia Caldas de Castro, Cássio Roberto Leonel Peterka, Carolina Ribas Kluge, Daniele Castro, José Bento Pereira Lima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marcela Lima DouradoFundação Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID 0009-0007-1193-0122
Rafaella Albuquerque E SilvaMinistério da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Márcia Caldas de CastroHarvard University, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, Estados Unidos da América.
Cássio Roberto Leonel PeterkaMinistério da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Carolina Ribas KlugeMinistério da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Daniele CastroFundação Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
José Bento Pereira LimaFundação Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria remains a major public health concern in Brazil, with the Amazon region accounting for 99.9% of the country's cases. Indoor residual spraying (IRS) using Etofenprox 20% PM is a core vector control strategy. However, inefficiencies in the insecticide custody chain, including planning, storage, and distribution, may compromise intervention effectiveness.

objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the insecticide custody chain from a process perspective, identifying logistical bottlenecks, while also exploring potential impact by examining associations between insecticide allocation and malaria burden in Brazil and in three high-incidence municipalities in the state of Amazonas (Barcelos, Tefé, and São Gabriel da Cachoeira) from 2019 to 2023. The underlying hypothesis is that in a well-functioning system, insecticide distribution should be correlated with malaria risk determinants, such as epidemiological and environmental variables, rather than merely responding to reported case counts.

methodsA mixed-methods approach was used. Quantitative analysis applied Pearson correlation, simple and multiple linear regressions (with time-lag), and ARIMA models to evaluate associations between insecticide volume and malaria cases, incorporating environmental and demographic covariates. A complementary qualitative assessment, based on a structured risk matrix, examined failures across four stages of the custody chain: planning, storage, application, and monitoring.

findingsAt the national level, insecticide volume was significantly associated with malaria cases (β = 0.161; p = 0.038; R² = 0.74) and deforestation (β = 0.626; p = 0.034). Time-series analysis revealed a reactive pattern, with insecticide allocation often lagging behind malaria incidence peaks. In the municipalities studied, models lacked statistical significance, but trends suggested weak local planning and disconnects from risk-based forecasting. The risk matrix revealed systemic weaknesses, including limited data interoperability, insufficient integration of environmental indicators, and poor federal coordination. MAIN

conclusionsThe current custody chain functions reactively and lacks integration with surveillance and predictive environmental data, contradicting World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations. Structural reforms are urgently needed. These include: (i) risk-based planning incorporating environmental variables, (ii) interoperable information systems, (iii) improved surveillance of vector resistance, and (iv) intergovernmental agreements for equitable and efficient resource allocation. Findings highlight the need for strategic reorientation of IRS logistics toward anticipatory and data-driven planning. Strengthening the custody chain through intersectoral coordination and environmental intelligence is essential not only to improve operational efficiency but also to increase the cost-effectiveness and epidemiological impact of malaria control interventions in the Amazon. Lessons learned may inform broader efforts in other endemic regions aiming for malaria elimination.

Indexed as

InsecticidesMalariaMosquito ControlAnimalsAnophelesBrazilHumansIncidenceInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID41810677
PMCPMC12965720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.