ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026
Convergent mechanisms, divergent strategies: a comparison of nectar intake between a generalist and a specialist bat species.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nectar-feeding bats exhibit a range of specialized adaptations that allow them to extract nectar from flowers efficiently. These adaptations include tongue morphological traits and feeding strategies that reflect varying degrees of specialization to nectarivory. While some aspects of the drinking mechanics of highly specialized nectar bats have been studied, little is known about the feeding behaviors of non-specialized species such as Phyllostomus discolor. This study compares the nectar extraction behaviors of P. discolor and the specialized Anoura geoffroyi, examining morphological and biomechanical adaptations that affect feeding efficiency and foraging strategies. We used electron microscopy to study the lingual surface, and high-speed videography to analyze tongue kinematics and feeding efficiency. Both bat species possess hair-like papillae that form a brush-like tongue surface, and both extract nectar using a lapping mechanism; however, they exhibited notable behavioral and biomechanical differences resulting in variation in feeding efficiency. Phyllostomus discolor has a shorter, less flexible tongue than A. geoffroyi, but exhibits similar licking frequencies. Unlike A. geoffroyi, which performs brief hover-feeding bouts, P. discolor perches on the inflorescences, drinks for longer, and extracts more nectar per visit. However, P. discolor exhibited lower feeding efficiency, likely due to its reduced tongue protrusion distance and shorter, less abundant papillae. These findings reveal convergence in general feeding mechanism, i.e. brush-tongue lapping, but highlight divergence in morphological and behavioral traits that affect feeding kinematics and efficiency. Our study illuminates how foraging strategy and tongue morphology affect drinking efficiency, pointing to evolutionary pathways that promote niche differentiation within nectar-feeding bat communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.