ArticleSurgeries2025
Foreign Body Presenting as Golden Hypopyon.
Article in Surgeries, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Penetrating intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) are ocular emergencies, often leading to preventable vision loss. This case report highlights a unique presentation of a work-related penetrating IOFB that mimicked a golden hypopyon. Methods: A 35-year-old male presented to the emergency department with sudden-onset pain and vision loss in the left eye while he was cutting a tree with metallic scissors. He had a visual acuity of 20/30 in the right eye and counting fingers in the left eye. A dilated slit-lamp examination and CT scan confirmed the presence of a 6-8 mm metallic IOFB in the anterior chamber, with no involvement of the lens or the posterior segment. Surgical removal was performed. Results: The metallic IOFB was removed surgically with IOFB forceps using a single paracentesis. The patient reported resolving pain and regained baseline visual acuity of 20/20 postoperatively, which remained stable at one-month follow-up. Conclusions: This case illustrates the successful surgical management of a penetrating metallic IOFB with a unique presentation mimicking a hypopyon. Emphasis on unique presentations of IOFBs can aid in timely management, ultimately reducing the risk of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.