Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41810397›Full record

ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2026

Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy with temporary percutaneous pedicle screw fixation as a fusion-sparing approach for giant recurrent L4/5 disc herniation and iatrogenic pars fracture in a young female: a case report.

Pragadesh Natarajan, Yingda Li

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pragadesh NatarajanFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7459-8805
Yingda LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Westmead Hospital, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reoperation after lumbar discectomy for recurrent disc herniation can be technically challenging due to surgical scarring and altered anatomy, especially if postoperative complications are present. Iatrogenic pars fractures are a rare but significant post-operative complication that can complicate management with potential to cause persistent back pain, radiculopathy, and progression to instability, particularly in young active patients if not treated appropriately. Case Description: The authors present the case of a 37-year-old female who presented with cauda equina syndrome following recent open lumbar laminectomy and discectomy, with imaging showing giant recurrent disc herniation and iatrogenic pars fracture. Patient underwent endoscopic transforaminal discectomy and temporary percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, with delayed hardware removal following fracture union. At follow-up, she demonstrated complete radiological cauda equina decompression and near-complete clinical recovery, with only minor residual sensory symptoms and preserved motion at that segment following hardware removal. Conclusions: This case demonstrates that a minimally invasive endoscopic approach to discectomy combined with temporary pedicle screw fixation may be a promising motion-preserving alternative in select cases of recurrent disc herniation and iatrogenic pars fracture in younger patients.

Indexed as

case reportiatrogenic pars fractureMinimally invasive spine surgeryrecurrent disc herniationtemporary fixation

Identifiers

PMID41810397
PMCPMC12968859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.