ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Simplifying Daily Cortisol Cycle Analysis: Validation and Benchmarking of the Cortisol Sine Score Against Cosinor and JTK_CYCLE models.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The daily cortisol cycle is a critical indicator of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function. The current analytical approaches produce several outputs difficult to integrate into simple statistical models, clinical workflows, and ML/AI pipelines requiring single-value inputs. We developed the Cortisol Sine Score (CSS), a model-free scalar metric that quantifies daily cortisol exposure by computing a weighted sum of cortisol measurements across the day, using sine-transformed time-of-day weights. The CSS produces positive values for morning-dominant patterns, negative values for evening-shifted profiles, and near-zero values for flattened rhythms characteristic of chronic stress and circadian disruption. We validated the CSS performance in 3,006 samples from 501 pregnant women enrolled in the March of Dimes program, with cortisol values measured at 6 time points per day collected during the second trimester of pregnancy. The CSS showed strong correlations with observed and model-estimated amplitude and acrophase from Cosinor regression and JTK_CYCLE approaches, with excellent classifying performance (AUC=0.89, high versus low). The CSS successfully captured established associations between social disadvantage and cortisol dysregulation, and demonstrated utility in predicting gut microbiome composition in metagenomic analyses. Importantly, the CSS maintains excellent fidelity to the full 6-sample protocol with as few as 3-4 daily measurements. The 4-sample protocol achieves great performance (r = 0.952, MAE = 0.087) while reducing participant burden. The 06:00 time point was identified as essential for accurate CSS quantification. The CSS bridges the gap between circadian analysis and practical implementation by providing a simple, interpretable, and robust assessment of cortisol daily cycle in large-scale epidemiological studies, clinical screening, and biomedical sensors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.