ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2026
Population-level neural rejuvenation dynamics in addiction: a computational framework for understanding developmental plasticity reactivation.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The neural rejuvenation hypothesis proposes that drugs of abuse reactivate developmental plasticity mechanisms to create abnormally persistent addiction memories. While individual molecular components have been characterized experimentally, the population-level dynamics and their collective contribution to addiction pathophysiology remain poorly understood. Objectives: To develop a computational framework tracking theoretical synaptic population dynamics during simulated drug exposure and withdrawal, and to demonstrate how coordinated population-level transitions could account for key experimental observations in addiction neuroscience. Methods: We constructed a mathematical model tracking four theoretical synaptic populations (adult, juvenile, silent, and matured synapses) using differential equations. The model incorporates two distinct processes: (1) rejuvenation of existing synapses through receptor composition switching, and (2) Results: The model demonstrated coordinated synaptic population transformations that qualitatively paralleled experimental observations. In simulation, results revealed distinct phases of neural rejuvenation with characteristic population dynamics: adult-to-juvenile conversion during exposure (reaching ~500 juvenile synapses in the model), Conclusion: This computational framework demonstrates how neural rejuvenation might operate as a population-level phenomenon, with sequential recruitment of different plasticity mechanisms creating robust addiction-related memories. The model generates testable hypotheses and provides a foundation for understanding potential therapeutic intervention windows targeting different phases of rejuvenation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.