Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41810357›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2026

Population-level neural rejuvenation dynamics in addiction: a computational framework for understanding developmental plasticity reactivation.

Mehdi Borjkhani, Hadi Borjkhani, Morteza A Sharif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mehdi BorjkhaniInternational Centre for Translational Eye Research (ICTER), Institute of Physical Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Hadi BorjkhaniHTW Berlin - University of Applied Sciences, Berlin, Germany.
Morteza A SharifOptics and Laser Engineering Group, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Urmia University of Technology, Urmia, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The neural rejuvenation hypothesis proposes that drugs of abuse reactivate developmental plasticity mechanisms to create abnormally persistent addiction memories. While individual molecular components have been characterized experimentally, the population-level dynamics and their collective contribution to addiction pathophysiology remain poorly understood. Objectives: To develop a computational framework tracking theoretical synaptic population dynamics during simulated drug exposure and withdrawal, and to demonstrate how coordinated population-level transitions could account for key experimental observations in addiction neuroscience. Methods: We constructed a mathematical model tracking four theoretical synaptic populations (adult, juvenile, silent, and matured synapses) using differential equations. The model incorporates two distinct processes: (1) rejuvenation of existing synapses through receptor composition switching, and (2) Results: The model demonstrated coordinated synaptic population transformations that qualitatively paralleled experimental observations. In simulation, results revealed distinct phases of neural rejuvenation with characteristic population dynamics: adult-to-juvenile conversion during exposure (reaching ~500 juvenile synapses in the model), Conclusion: This computational framework demonstrates how neural rejuvenation might operate as a population-level phenomenon, with sequential recruitment of different plasticity mechanisms creating robust addiction-related memories. The model generates testable hypotheses and provides a foundation for understanding potential therapeutic intervention windows targeting different phases of rejuvenation.

Indexed as

addictioncomputational modelingneural rejuvenationNMDA receptorssilent synapsessynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID41810357
PMCPMC12968142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.