ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Disruption and recovery: a qualitative study on health services for vulnerable populations during the pandemic.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Public health emergencies like pandemics results in systemic disruptions, leading to substantial indirect consequences beyond direct morbidity and mortality. The experiences from previous outbreaks have shown disproportionate effects on the vulnerable groups. This study aims to identify the challenges faced by these groups in attaining routine health services during the COVID-19 pandemic and the strategies used for service recovery. A qualitative study done in Jodhpur district in Western India using inductive thematic approach. Data were collected through eight key informant interviews with healthcare workers and twenty in-depth interviews with patients from vulnerable groups. Vulnerable populations reported reduced healthcare access due to fear, transport barriers, and staff shortages, often resorting to private care. Frontline health workers faced initial service disruptions but later resumed community outreach with COVID-appropriate behavior. Health facilities adapted to the pandemic by prioritizing essential services, utilizing teleconsultations, and ensuring home delivery of medications despite PPE shortages and workforce redistribution. Vaccination faced challenges including digital registration issues, misinformation, and hesitancy, mitigated through local leadership and community engagement. Catch-up programs effectively addressed missed immunizations and TB care, highlighting system resilience and recovery efforts. Vulnerable groups have specific and increased needs during times of crises like pandemics, that must be addressed specifically. Targeted interventions that are acceptable and appropriate should be implemented to bridge gaps in healthcare access. Future preparedness plans must institutionalize adaptive strategies to ensure equitable access to care and safeguard the vulnerable populations during crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.