Observational studyFrontiers in public health2026
Influence of social media channels on tobacco product consumption behaviors in people aged 18-30 years.
Observational study in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The use of nicotine through smoking and vaping is a risk factor for chronic diseases. Today, the younger generation (ages 16-25) is potentially exposed to nicotine-related marketing through using social media. Here, we assessed associations between nicotine consumption types and specific social media channel engagement, and whether there is a connection between channels, preferred content, and nicotine consumption type. Methods: This observational, cross-sectional, online survey was conducted among individuals aged 18-30 via a university's communication channels in three waves, capturing self-reported social media habits and nicotine use behaviors. Participants confirmed that they were at least 18 years old and proficient in German. The questionnaire was voluntary, pseudonymous, and conducted in accordance with General Data Protection Regulation. Nicotine users and non-users were welcome, and it was assumed that most people had some social media exposure. Only the leading social media platforms were reviewed. Multinomial logistic regressions examined the relationship between smoking status and social media usage intensity, with smokers serving as the dependent variable. Results: Overall, 300 questionnaires were completed and analyzed. An association was found between nicotine consumption behavior and social media channels, with vapers having the highest use of Instagram (OR, 1.905 vs. non-smokers, OR 1.469 vs. smokers) and X (OR, 1.241 vs. non-smokers, OR 1.409 vs. smokers) compared to other channels. YouTube (OR, 1.774) was the preferred platform for smokers vs. vapers, and Instagram (OR, 1.297) was the preferred platform for smokers vs. non-smokers. Smokers consumed more knowledge and science content (OR, 1.225) and less fashion and beauty content (OR, 0.756) than non-smokers. Smokers consumed significantly more news content (OR, 3.731), and substantially less gaming content (OR, 0.310) and fashion and beauty content (OR, 0.451) than vapers. Discussion: Our study highlights a potential association between social media use and nicotine consumption in Germany. It raises questions about how the nicotine industry uses visual and linguistic methods to foster addictive behaviors by promoting tobacco accessories, which circumvent the current bans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.