Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41810274›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of applied & basic medical research

Virtual Autopsy in Medicolegal Investigations: A Systematic Review of Accuracy and Practical Utility.

Padmakumar Krishnankutty Nair

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of applied & basic medical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Padmakumar Krishnankutty NairDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute, Thrissur, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual autopsy is a significant innovation in the field of forensic medicine and medicolegal investigations. This systematic review aims to evaluate the accuracy and practical utility of virtual autopsy in medicolegal investigations. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines were followed in the conduct of this systematic review. The literature search encompassed an extensive database including PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Studies published from 2014 to 2024 were included in the analysis. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the proper tools suited to the study design. The synthesis and analysis of data included a narrative summary of study characteristics, aims and objectives, techniques, and main findings of the study. Sample sizes in the selected studies ranged from 16 to 145 cases. The most common virtual autopsy techniques used were postmortem computed tomography (PMCT). Some studies used PMCT and conventional autopsy, while some studies used only PMCT, and a few studies applied combinations of PMCT and conventional autopsy, along with other techniques such as postmortem magnetic resonance, PMCT angiography, and traditional invasive autopsy to evaluate various conditions in medicolegal investigations. This systematic review concludes that virtual autopsy offers significant benefits, such as noninvasiveness and the ability to document findings digitally, but its limitations in differentiating ante mortem and postmortem changes, lack of tissue sampling, and challenges in soft tissue analysis restrict its ability to fully replace conventional autopsies.

Indexed as

Forensic imagingpostmortem imagingvirtopsyvirtual autopsy

Identifiers

PMID41810274
PMCPMC12970759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.