ArticleInternational journal of applied & basic medical research
Cardioprotective Effects of Dapagliflozin against Isoproterenol-induced Myocardial Injury in Rats: Biochemical and Histopathological Evidence.
Article in International journal of applied & basic medical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Commentary on "Cardioprotective Effects of Dapagliflozin against Isoproterenol-induced Myocardial Injury in Rats: Biochemical and Histopathological Evidence".International journal of applied & basic medical researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As a leading cause of global morbidity, myocardial infarction (MI) is a primary focus of medical research. The isoproterenol (ISO)-induced model of cardiac injury is a cornerstone of this work, providing a validated experimental system that simulates the human condition. This study investigated the cardioprotective potential of dapagliflozin (DAPA), a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, against ISO-induced myocardial injury in adult male rats. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two rats were divided into four groups; Control group, DAPA-only group: DAPA (1 mg/kg/day, orally, 14 days) + saline, ISO-only: Saline (orally, 14 days) + ISO (100 mg/kg/day, days 13-14) and fourth group, DAPA + ISO: pretreated with DAPA 1 mg/kg/day orally) for 14 days, followed by ISO 100 mg/kg, subcutaneously days 13-14. DAPA's protective effects against ISO-induced MI were evaluated by assessing cardiac damage by measuring serum biomarkers of heart injury while simultaneously evaluating oxidative stress through lipid peroxidation levels and antioxidant activity in cardiac tissue. Histopathological examination revealed structural changes in myocardial tissue, complemented by molecular analysis quantifying the expression of key apoptotic regulators. Results: Biochemical analysis revealed that DAPA significantly reduced ISO-induced elevations in cardiac troponin-I, creatine kinase-MB, lactate dehydrogenase, and oxidative stress markers; malondialdehyde, superoxide dismutase, and reduced glutathione. DAPA also attenuated inflammatory cytokines: tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Histopathological examination of heart tissues demonstrated that DAPA mitigated ISO-induced myocardial necrosis and inflammatory infiltration, preserving cardiac architecture. Moreover, DAPA downregulated the pro-apoptotic protein (Bax) expression and upregulated the anti-apoptotic protein (Bcl2) levels in the heart. Conclusions: These findings suggest that DAPA exerts multimodal cardio-protection beyond its antidiabetic action, positioning it as a promising adjunct therapy for ischemic heart disease. Further clinical studies are warranted to validate its translational potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.