Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41810267›Full record

ReviewJournal of nursing management2026

Experiences of Newly Graduate Nurses With Workplace Violence: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.

Gilny Rantung, Yaping Zhong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gilny RantungFaculty of Nursing, Indonesian Adventist University, Kabupaten Bandung Barat, Jawa Barat, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3873-1514
Yaping ZhongMonash Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Clayton Victoria, Australia, monash.ac.za.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1372-7669

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: To explore and integrate qualitative evidence on the experiences of workplace violence as reported in studies involving newly graduated nurses, with a focus on its forms, coping mechanisms and resulting effects. Design: Qualitative meta-synthesis. Methods: The review included qualitative studies relevant to the topic. A systematic search was conducted from database inception to September 2024. The quality of the included studies was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts before inclusion. Data analysis was conducted using a thematic synthesis approach. Data Sources: A systematic literature search was conducted in eight databases: CINAHL, Scopus, Emcare, Web of Science, ProQuest, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO. Results: Eighteen studies were included. The synthesis identified five forms of workplace violence, four coping strategies, and five consequence domains. These findings informed a conceptual model illustrating workplace violence as a cyclical, systemically reinforced process linking its manifestations, the coping responses employed by new nurses and the resulting personal and professional impacts. Conclusion: New nurses experienced cyclical and systemic workplace violence. Their coping mechanisms provided temporary relief but did not address the root causes of workplace hostility. This led to lasting negative effects and reinforced further workplace violence, requiring both individual and organisational interventions to disrupt the cycle.

Indexed as

NursesWorkplace ViolenceAdaptation, PsychologicalCoping SkillsHumansQualitative ResearchWorkplacemeta synthesisnew graduate nursesworkplace violence

Identifiers

PMID41810267
PMCPMC12968069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.