ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Prevalence and distribution of low and high myopia in Mexican outpatients: a nationwide cross-sectional clinic-based study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Myopia is a global public health concern and a leading cause of distance vision impairment, affecting mainly children and young adults. Although several studies have reported myopia prevalence in Mexico, recent nationwide data, especially regarding high myopia, are lacking following the COVID-19 pandemic. We estimated the prevalence and distribution of low and high myopia in a cohort of Mexican outpatients. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional, clinic-based study was conducted using anonymized electronic health records from Salud Digna clinics. Data included individuals aged 6-100 years undergoing routine non-cycloplegic eye examinations between January and December 2023. Myopia was defined as spherical equivalent refraction (SER) ≤ -0.50 diopters (D) in the right eye and subclassified into low (-6.0 D < SER ≤ -0.50 D) or high (SER ≤ -6.0 D). Age-standardized prevalence rates were estimated overall and by sex and geographic location. Multinomial logistic regression evaluated potential risk between demographic/clinical background and myopia severity. Results: From 3,507,826 records, 1,337,526 (38.13%) individuals were myopic (median age: 28 years; 61.4% females). Age-standardized rates for total, low, and high myopia were 44.44% (95% CI, 44.36-44.52%), 43.31% (95% CI, 43.24-43.39%), and 1.12% (95% CI, 1.11-1.14%), respectively. Low myopia was more prevalent in males, whereas high myopia predominated in females (both Conclusion: Astigmatism was a risk factor for myopia, with increasing severity raising the risk of developing both forms of myopia. Although high myopia remains relatively uncommon nationally, its increasing prevalence from childhood to early adulthood highlights the need for early detection and close monitoring to mitigate future visual impairment in Mexico.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.