ArticleJSES international2026
Risk factors for postoperative retears in patients with small to medium tears following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
Article in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: the effect of cuff tear size on outcomes and recovery trajectories.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The retear rate after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for small/medium tears is considered lower than that for large/massive tears. However, few studies have reported risk factors for small/medium retears. Therefore, this study investigated the risk factors for small/medium retears following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods: The retrospective study involved 129 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for small/medium rotator cuff tears at our hospital between January 2018 and June 2021. Clinical evaluations at preoperative and final follow-up were conducted using the criteria of University of California, Los Angeles score and Constant Shoulder score, and the achievement of minimal clinically important difference of those scores were recorded. Physical examination findings, imaging findings (stump classification and Goutallier classification), suturing methods, and past medical history including smoking history and diabetes were investigated to assess their relevance to clinical outcomes and retear. At the final postoperative follow-up, structural outcome was evaluated using magnetic resonance images, and Sugaya classification type 4 or 5 was defined as a retear. Results: In total, 76 male and 53 female patients with a mean age of 64.2 ± 9.1 years were enrolled. The shortest follow-up period was 12 months postoperatively (range, 12-44 months; mean, 22.09 ± 7.27 months). All clinical scores of 129 patients showed significant postoperative improvement ( Conclusion: This study showed that after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for small/medium rotator cuff tears, patients are exposed to a substantial number of risk factors of postoperative retears of which symptom duration and absence of traumatic episodes were the only inter-related factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.