ArticleBioMed research international2026
Pulse of Generosity: A Qualitative Insight Into the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Motivations of Voluntary Blood Donors at a Tertiary Care Hospital, Maldives.
Article in BioMed research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pulse of Generosity: A Qualitative Insight Into the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Motivations of Voluntary Blood Donors at a Tertiary Care Hospital, Maldives.BioMed research international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Blood donation plays a vital role in healthcare, especially in the Maldives, where a high prevalence of thalassemia creates a significant demand for regular blood transfusions. Despite this need, the country relies heavily on directed blood donations, with limited participation from voluntary nonremunerated donors (VNRDs). Addressing donor recruitment, retention, and knowledge gaps is essential to ensure a safe and sufficient blood supply. Aim: This study is aimed at assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and motivations of voluntary blood donors registered at a tertiary care blood bank and at identifying strategies to enhance recruitment and retention of regular voluntary blood donors. Method: A qualitative approach was adopted, with data collected through interviews with 12 voluntary blood donors. Thematic analysis was conducted to explore participants' knowledge, attitudes, and motivations and to identify challenges and potential solutions for improving voluntary blood donation rates. Findings: The study revealed that while donors displayed positive attitudes toward blood donation, misconceptions about the safest type of donors persisted, with 25% believing family donors were safer than voluntary donors. Key barriers included a lack of structured recruitment programs, limited donor retention efforts, and an insufficient focus on donor recognition. Participants recommended awareness campaigns, improved donation facilities, personalized donor engagement, and enhanced recognition programs to encourage repeat donations. Conclusion: Increasing voluntary blood donations in the Maldives requires a donor-centric approach, incorporating structured recruitment and retention strategies, robust awareness campaigns, and improved donor experiences. These findings provide actionable insights to strengthen the national blood transfusion system and ensure a sustainable and safe blood supply.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.