ReviewBioMed research international2026
Beyond Laparotomy: Multimodal Strategies and Emerging Evidence in Minimally Invasive Management of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.
Review in BioMed research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond Laparotomy: Multimodal Strategies and Emerging Evidence in Minimally Invasive Management of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.BioMed research international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a type of potentially malignant mesenchymal tumor, thought to arise from the interstitial cells of the gut. More than half of all GIST cases occur primarily in the stomach. Currently, radical resection remains the only curative treatment for this disease. This review is aimed at summarizing recent advances in surgical management and operative techniques for resectable gastric GISTs. Summary: Risk stratification of small gastric GISTs is expected to resolve ongoing debates regarding their management, while artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted imaging shows promise for early detection. In tumors located at unfavorable sites, R1 resection has been shown to achieve oncological outcomes comparable to those of R0 resection, thereby expanding surgical options. The principles of en bloc resection and avoidance of tumor rupture remain critical in intraperitoneal surgery. However, their applicability in endoscopic resection (ER) remains uncertain. Clinical studies have confirmed the long-term oncological safety and superior short-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection (LR), even for tumors larger than 5 cm. For LR in challenging locations, expert centers, robotic assistance, and laparoscopic intragastric surgery represent viable alternatives. Innovations and integration of endoscopic techniques have improved the efficiency and feasibility of ER for gastric GISTs, while also reducing complication rates. As an emerging approach, laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) combines the advantages of both LR and ER, offering reliable oncological control with a lower incidence of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.