Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41810187›Full record

ArticleTranslational pediatrics2026

Development and evaluation of a predictive model for central precocious puberty in girls.

Yufan Wu, Chaoliang Xu, Jingdi Li, Danli Zhang, Yuqi Wu, Xueyong Feng, Hongwu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yufan Wu *Department of Pediatrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Chaoliang Xu *Department of Pediatrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Jingdi LiDepartment of Pediatrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Danli ZhangDepartment of Pediatrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Yuqi WuDepartment of Pediatrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Xueyong FengDepartment of Pediatrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Hongwu WangDepartment of Pediatrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early puberty, particularly central precocious puberty (CPP), is an increasingly common pediatric endocrine disorder affecting young girls. Existing CPP predictive models either rely on post-gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulation data or lack comprehensive integration of clinical, laboratory, and imaging indices, limiting their utility for early screening. This study developed a single blood draw-based predictive model for CPP screening or diagnosis. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at a single center (The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College) and included girls diagnosed with precocious puberty. The training cohort consisted of patients enrolled from April 2021 to April 2023, while the external validation cohort comprised patients enrolled from January to November 2025. Inclusion criteria included secondary sexual traits before age 8 and completion of the GnRH test; exclusion criteria were >30% missing data, organic lesions, and tumors. Clinical, laboratory, and imaging data were analyzed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and logistic model regression for variable selection and model construction. The gold standard for CPP diagnosis was the GnRH stimulation test [peak luteinizing hormone (LH) ≥5.0 IU/L and LH/follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) ratio >0.6]. Model reliability was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), decision curve analysis, Brier score, 10-fold cross-validation and external validation. Results: This study enrolled 206 girls with precocious puberty who presented to our hospital from April 2021 to April 2023 as the training cohort. Of these, 88 (42.7%) had CPP with a mean age of 8.32±1.10 years, and 118 (57.3%) had non-CPP with a mean age of 6.98±1.18 years. The LASSO-logistic regression model identified six predictors for CPP: age, estradiol, FSH, LH, breast Tanner stage, and bone age. The model demonstrated good discriminative performance, with an AUC of 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.889-0.959], the sensitivity of 0.886, specificity of 0.805 and a Brier score of 0.113. The calibration curve showed good agreement between predicted probabilities and observed values. Decision curve analysis indicated that the model could yield good clinical net benefit across a wide range of threshold probabilities. Ten-fold internal cross-validation also confirmed that the predictive model had good performance, with an AUC of 0.929 and the Brier score of 0.12690. For external validation, this study enrolled 97 girls with precocious puberty who presented to our hospital from January to November 2025. The results showed that the model maintained good performance [AUC: 0.924 (95% CI: 0.861-0.982)], sensitivity of 0.795, specificity of 0.966, Brier score =0.094). For clinical convenience, the prediction model has been deployed on a web-based dynamic nomogram platform. Conclusions: In this study, we developed a high-performing dynamic nomogram web page that accurately predicts individual CPP risk in girls, aiding screening and diagnosis.

Indexed as

central precocious puberty (CPP)Girlnomogramspredictive model

Identifiers

PMID41810187
PMCPMC12969173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.