ArticleTranslational pediatrics2026
Diagnostic yield of exome and genome sequencing for critically ill pediatric cardiac patients.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Genetic testing guidelines for children in cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) remain limited despite a high prevalence of genetic diseases among this population. Advances in next-generation sequencing technologies, especially exome sequencing (ES) and genome sequencing (GS), enable more comprehensive genetic evaluations than traditional testing modalities such as chromosomal microarray (CMA). While testing recommendations exist for cardiomyopathies and arrhythmias, broad application of next-generation sequencing, especially ES/GS, across indications for admission to CICU has not been recommended amongst cardiology societies. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of ES/GS in critically ill pediatric patients with cardiac disease. Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients who underwent clinical ES/GS in a quaternary hospital's pediatric CICU between January 2020 and August 2023. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were collected and analyzed. Results were compared by test type, cardiac phenotype, and extracardiac anomalies status. Results: Forty-five patients underwent clinical ES/GS, with median age at testing of 33 [7-905] days. Primary cardiac phenotypes included congenital heart disease (CHD), ventricular dysfunction, and arrhythmia. Diagnostic results were found in 20 patients (44.4%) with 18/20 (90%) linked to cardiac phenotypes. Diagnostic yield was not different among cardiac phenotype groups but was higher in patients with extracardiac anomalies. Notably, gene panels would have failed to make 36% of diagnoses made by ES/GS. Conclusions: ES and GS provided high diagnostic yield in critically ill cardiac patients across various phenotypes. As next-generation sequencing technologies and interpretation capabilities mature, diagnostic abilities in pediatric cardiac disease will continue to advance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.