ReviewSA journal of radiology2026
Multimodal imaging in conductive hearing loss: Optimising CT, MRI and CTA for accurate diagnosis and management.
Review in SA journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conductive hearing loss (CHL) results from impaired mechanical transmission of sound through the external or middle ear and is commonly associated with conditions such as otosclerosis, cholesteatoma, ossicular discontinuity, congenital malformations and trauma. Less frequently, it may arise from vascular or neoplastic lesions. Imaging plays a central role in the evaluation of CHL, with high-resolution CT (HRCT) regarded as the gold standard for initial assessment because of its superior spatial resolution in detecting bony pathologies, including fenestral otosclerosis, ossicular chain defects, third-window lesions and trauma-related disruptions. MRI complements HRCT by providing excellent soft tissue contrast, facilitating the detection of postoperative cholesteatoma via non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging and the characterisation of vascular tumours such as glomus tympanicum. CT angiography (CTA), while not routinely indicated, can be valuable for identifying vascular anomalies and aiding surgical planning in selected cases. Technical considerations, such as optimised scan parameters, strategies for radiation dose reduction in paediatric patients and the integration of multiple imaging modalities, are essential for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment planning. Collectively, HRCT, MRI and CTA provide a structured, evidence-based framework for the comprehensive evaluation and management of CHL. Contribution: This review synthesises current evidence on HRCT, MRI and CTA in the assessment of CHL, emphasising their complementary roles, protocol optimisation and multimodal integration to enhance diagnostic accuracy and surgical guidance in both paediatric and adult populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.