Knowledge, attitudes and current practices regarding LI-RADS

Rajshree Segobin, Dale Creamer, Rufaida Khan, Eduard Jonas, Sanju Sobnach, Sulaiman Moosa

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in SA journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rajshree SegobinDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9727-9561

Dale CreamerDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1620-5855

Rufaida KhanDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9638-5314

Eduard JonasDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0123-256X

Sanju SobnachDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4456-2115

Sulaiman MoosaDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1329-4960

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is highly prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). LI-RADS Objectives: This study assessed knowledge, attitudes and current practices related to LI-RADS in SSA, with a view to identifying barriers to its utilisation and informing targeted educational interventions. Method: A 21-item anonymous electronic questionnaire was distributed to medical professionals in SSA using the SurveyMonkey online platform. Knowledge, attitudes and current practices regarding LI-RADS Results: There were 134 respondents from 14 of the 34 SSA countries. Radiologists significantly outperformed non-radiologists in LI-RADS Conclusion: Although LI-RADS Contribution: This survey highlights the needs for targeted educational initiatives and improved training to enhance the adoption and use of LI-RADS

Indexed as

attitudeseducationhepatocellular carcinomaknowledgeLI-RADS®sub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID41810164

DOI10.4102/sajr.v30i1.3367

PMCPMC12969652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.