Observational studyThe breast journal2026
Understanding Disparities in Breast Reconstruction Rates in Regional Populations Following Oncologic Resection of Breast Cancer: A 10-Year Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.
Observational study in The breast journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women globally, with 2.3 million new cases in 2020. Globally, incidence rates of breast cancer are highest in Australia, yet only 29% of Australian women opt for breast reconstruction (BR). The decision-making process for BR is complex, involving various surgical and nonsurgical considerations. Approximately 50% of women would choose BR if adequately informed and given the option. This study evaluates the factors contributing to reduced BR rates in regional and rural New South Wales over a 10-year period. Methods: A multicentre, retrospective observational cohort study analysed 2052 women who were diagnosed with breast cancer in the Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District between 2012 and 2022, focussing on primary resection outcomes and other objective factors that contributed to BR rates. Descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests and logistic regression were used to assess relationships between age, comorbidities, language and rurality, with reconstruction rates. Results: Among the 2052 women diagnosed with breast cancer who required oncologic resection, the mean age was 65 years. Only 127 (6.2%) underwent BR across the total cohort of 2052 patients, and just 65 of the 724 (9%) patients in the post-mastectomy subgroup underwent BR, significantly lower than state averages. Significant relationships were found between age and reconstruction rates ( Conclusion: Women aged < 55 years old and those residing in metropolitan areas showed a higher likelihood of opting for BR, highlighting the influence of age and rural residency on access to reconstruction services. These findings emphasise the need for targeted interventions to enhance BR access, particularly for older and rural patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.