ArticleInfectious Disease Modelling2026
Acute respiratory infection (COVID-19) risk prediction in travelers: A random forest model.
Article in Infectious Disease Modelling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early screening during outbreaks of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) is critical for controlling disease spread among international travelers. However, the massive volume of traveler data generated in a short timeframe makes manual screening of suspected cases impractical for health quarantine officers. Prediction models for infection offer a promising solution to this challenge. Methods: Key predictive variables including travel history and seat numbers were extracted from passenger itineraries to construct the risk assessment model. Random forest algorithm and multivariate logistic regression were used to build prediction models of COVID-19 infection separately. Compare their performance through sensitivity(recall for the positive class), specificity, accuracy, AUC and Brier score. Sort the importance of variables through random forest algorithm. Results: The random forest model exhibited better discriminative ability and calibration. Variable importance analysis revealed travel history-derived factors as top predictors: close contacts(0.419), flight risk (0.286), and sojourn risk (0.182). Infection prevalence stratified by risk level: flight risk: low risk vs high risk: 0.7% vs 1.4%; sojourn risk: low risk vs high risk: 0.7% vs 2.0%; close contacts vs non-close contact: 0.3% vs 2.4%. Conclusions: The prediction model based on random forest algorithm has a better performance in identifying infected passengers than multivariate regression model. We should pay more attention on variables extracted by epidemiological history in building prediction model of respiratory infectious diseases. This model demonstrates strong potential for effectively responding to future outbreaks of acute infectious diseases such as COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.